In case you guys have been living under a rock and haven't heard the latest scandal: nude photos of Jennifer Lawrence has been leaked. Yes, feminists' poster girl, and disgustingly fat JLaw (sarcasm intended). While usually I don't even bother with things like these, I recently chanced upon tweets by people who clearly rate quite high on the idiot spectrum.

Leaking someone's private nude photos without their consent is sexual assault. And should be prosecuted as such.

— Jane Pinckard (@miyukijane) September 1, 2014

Stealing someone's naked photos is the same as tearing someone's clothes off in public. It's sexual assault. — Lucas Neff (@RealLucasNeff) September 1, 2014

Taking or disseminating naked photos of someone without their consent is a sexual assault. It's awful that people need reminding of this.

— Tom Greeves (@tomgreeves) September 2, 2014

Why you shouldn't be clicking on anyone's leaked private photos ... Don't perpetuate the assault! http://t.co/ZiMva2b4x2 #jenniferlawrence — Kate Drummond (@Gotta_Be_K_D) September 1, 2014

Unless you got a text from Jennifer Lawrence saying "Hey bae, thankin' 'boutcha ;-* ", you looking at her pic is sexual assault.

— Ms Elyse MoFo Andery (@dELYSEious) September 2, 2014

So by merely looking at naked pictures of someone suddenly I am literally raping them?

While you might think that this level of stupidity only exist in "progressive" liberal 'Murica, I chanced upon another article written by a Singaporean blogger defending her right to "her body" (something she keeps emphasizing).

Don't get me wrong, I'm not promoting Taliban-esque restrictions on any women's right to sexual freedom. In fact, I encourage it. What disturbs me the most is the constant victimizing of their gender that women (and manboobz) constantly frame women in.

"Men are aggressors and women are victims" is the mantra of modern feminism. I would liken these feminists to children, who want the freedom and autonomy to do whatever the fuck they want and not bear the consequences. They try to subvert the karmic physics that every action has consequences. And the only way they see it is by limiting men's freedom of sexual expression to promote women's freedom of sexual expression. How's that for equality?

I'm all for women being sexually curious, despite human biology and sociology clearly showing that sexual promiscuity in women (and not men) greatly affecting the quality of relationships. Hey, it's the 21st Century. Do whatever the fuck you want. But you have to bear the consequences of your actions, moreso for women, whose sexual market value suddenly drops when they hit "the wall". I'll be honest and say that men don't have it that hard, and rightly so, based on genetic differences. Yet feminists like to say that women and men are not so different, and by "not so different" they are trying to imply "exactly the same just with different woohoo parts". It is only until they reach their mid thirties that they realize the folly of their actions, but what does one do when one is suddenly faced with irrefutable evidence that one's hypothesis is wrong?

No, one doesn't simply switch positions--rather, people are more likely to rationalize their mistaken beliefs, and believe in them more strongly.

But back to the topic on point. I am not angry at feminists for furthering women's sexual freedom; I think it has good intentions. But the problem arises when they have to suppress the sexual freedom of another gender to do so, and really, I don't see any other way. Feminists constantly try to shame men into hiding their sexuality. I had a lecture in my advertising class on the use of sex in advertising and whether it is ethical or not. Throughout the lecture, there were uncomfortable giggling from both my fellow classmates. Even my lecturer had problems talking about sex despite the environment totally being nonsexual. Also, it was constantly being pointed out that "women's bodies are being objectified and degraded". Of course it seems like it when all you see are examples of that in your lecture slides, and even so, they were not even degrading.

Most people fail to understand sexual dynamics. Men want women for sex, and objectify them as such. But women want men for resources, and although that is slowly being eliminated (leading to men being unnecessary agents in the economic and sexual markets), advertisements do objectify men as being economic agents whose sole purpose is to provide value and resources for women. Does anyone cry foul, then?

It seems that feminism's main weapon to expand its dangerous ideology is to constantly frame women as helpless victims to the Patriarchy, and expanding the definition of what is rape and what isn't. Everything is the fault of men, who, therefore, have to be rigorously rounded up and muzzled. There is no space for men to discuss gender issues in modern society except in spaces where women are actively being kept out of (the manosphere).

There is no such thing as a male safe space anymore. Women (AWARE) are gradually starting to invade and dictate what used to traditionally be male-spaces, such as the military, politics, and the economy. And when everyone who does not agree with the mainstream narrative is actively suppressed and silenced, and words are constantly redefined to fit their agenda, the discourse of our society will shift and men will increasingly be marginalized, and ultimately obliterated from society altogether.

I shall end off with a quote by the great French philosopher of the Enlightenment era, François-Marie Arouet (more commonly known as Voltaire):

"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?"

To Learn More, Read These:

On “Rape Culture” Rape, Victim Blaming, Slut Shaming, And Feminism